I was a somewhat regular 24 Hr. Fitness guy for about eight or nine years, but I let the membership slide sometime around ’02. Last week I grimmed up to the fact that sooner or later I’d have a Quentin Tarantino body if I didn’t turn things around, so I’ve become an Equinox guy. I’ll be going back to the usual regimen (25 minutes on a treadmill, nautilus and free weights for a half-hour) with a limited membership for only $150 per month plus extras.

“Limited” means you go to just one club. (There are several scattered around Manhattan.) The one I’ve chosen is at B’way and 19th Street.

The closer was Equinox’s laundry policy. For an extra $70 per month you can drop off your sweaty workout duds and they’ll be clean and good to go the next time you come in. No lugging a gym bag around or having to personally wash the damn things over and over! I’ll have to rent a regular locker, of course. I bought a combo lock last weekend. I’ve settled on the B’way and 19th Street location)

The daily plan is to write the column from 6:30 or 7 am to 11 or 11:30, and then hit the club around noon or 12:30 pm, and then back at it around 2 pm in a nearby Starbucks for two or three hours. And then some wander-around time before the evening screenings start at 6 or 7 pm. Six or seven days a week, I’m thinking. Okay, I may slack off on weekends.

Another idea is popping Hoodia appetite-suppressant pills. Of course, if I really want to drop 25 or 30 pounds I’ll need to stop the 16 ounce cans of beer at the end of the day.

It’s very cool and commendable of How to Train Your Dragon co-directors Dean DeBlois and Chris Sanders to have hired legendary Coen Bros. lenser Roger Deakins in order to “distinguish their film from other animated work…someone who could see light in a different way.” Seeing How to Train Your Dragon is out of the question pour moi, of course. My age-old aversion to family-friendly animated films based on “whimsical” children’s books…sorry.

Obviously a super-sized Times Square billboard circa March 1969, but a truly terrible film. You can just barely discern that Where Eagles Dare and Support Your Local Sheriff were playing at the Astor and Victoria.

The film that may have been responsible for the early to mid ’70s wave of disaster films, which ironically reached their peak with Richard Lester’s Juggernaut, a superior suspense film that included no disaster shots whatsoever but was funded as another disaster-brand attraction.

Vincent Canby‘s review of Krakatoa, East of Java, published on 6.26.69, reads as follows:

“If I hadn’t read the credits first, I would have sworn that the new Cinerama production had been made by Mike and George Kuchar, the satirical, underground movie-makers whose science fiction triumph, The Sins of the Fleshapoids, was made in a New York apartment.

“The reversal of truth, so consistent and systematic that it becomes a positive style, is not achieved casually. Krakatoa, East of Java is about the volcano west of Java that erupted in 1883. It opens with the climax in the credits and proceeds to the beginning. It was shot in Cinerama by a television director who, through the use of lots of tight close-ups, makes people look bigger than mountains.

“Its most breath-taking panoramic shots are of things like shoes and foreheads. Although it should depend on a variety of special, cataclysmic effects, it has so few different ones that by the time the movie ended, I had gotten to know and recognize volcanic rocks that had flown by me before.

“The ads for the movie, which opened to the public yesterday at the Cinerama Theater, carry a quote from a Los Angeles reviewer praising a ‘terrifying typhoon,’ which is not in the movie. Maximilian Schell, Rosanno Brazzi, Brian Keith and Sal Mineo are.

“Footnote: Krakatoa, the island site of the 1883 volcanic eruption, lies in the Sunda Strait, west of Java. I’m told the geographic error in the movie’s title was discovered only after all the advertising and publicity materials had been prepared. The producers, after considering the high cost of geographic accuracy, vetoed a suggestion that new materials be printed.”

I’m not touching the no-fake-boobs-on-Pirates of the Caribbean 4 story — it’s too vapid, and besides implants would clearly violate the remarkable sense of historical exactitude that the Pirates movies have provided thus far. I’m sensing that this story may be a blade of grass foretelling what the lawn is going to look like when director Rob “tanning spray” Marshall (Nine, Memoirs of a Geisha) turns in his director’s cut.

Every now and then I search around for photos of splendorific Times Square marquees from the 1930s, ’40s, ’50s and ’60s. And I never find much. There have to be collectors out there who have shots of big-time marquees ballyhooing famous films. I’m looking for sites I haven’t discovered, scans of privately-owned stills…anything. Color is preferable but I’ll take what I can get — thanks.

As I write this, the House of Representatives is enacting President Obama‘s watered-down, barely-worth-the-name health care legislation with no single-payer and no public option. It’s 11:07 pm, and the favoring vote tally just went over 216. Better than nothing and fine as far as it goes, but more than a bit of a letdown for some of us.

“This is about as interesting as it gets in politics,” MSNBC commentator Ed Schultz has just said. “The Democrats now own — lock, stock, and barrel — health care reform in America.”

“Congress gave final approval on Sunday to legislation that would provide medical coverage to tens of millions of uninsured Americans,” the N.Y. Times story says, “and remake the nation’s health care system along the lines proposed by President Obama.

“Representative Bart Stupak of Michigan said that anti-abortion Democrats were satisfied with a proposed executive order “to ensure that federal funds are not used for abortion services.”

“By a vote of 219 to 212, the House passed the bill after a day of tumultuous debate that echoed the epic struggle of the last year. The action sent the bill to President Obama, whose crusade for such legislation has been a hallmark of his presidency.

“Democrats hailed the vote as historic, comparable to the establishment of Medicare and Social Security and a long overdue step forward in social justice. ‘This is the civil rights act of the 21st century,’ said Representative James E. Clyburn of South Carolina, the No. 3 Democrat in the House.”

Sandra Bullock‘s Facebook declaration that she’s “single” isn’t too surprising, given the recently disclosed details. What got me was her statement that her political views are “conservative.” What?

HE reader David Speranza took this in Madison Square Park at 5:44 pm last Friday afternoon. And nobody blinked or gasped or anything. It was Speranza’s impression that the mordibly obese woman eating potato chips was “with” the flame-head.

Two days ago I wrote that seeing a film that was shot 18 months or two years ago can sometimes result (in your mind at least) in a slightly dated feeling — a hard-to-define sense of diminishment due to the film having passed its peak potency in terms of relating to the here-and-now. The case in point was an Australian thriller called The Square (Apparition, 4.9).

Lbs., a very decently written, affectingly performed little indie drama about fighting food addiction from director Matthew Bonifacio and co-writer/star Carmine Famiglietti that — get this — began principal photography in June 2001 and then played at the 2004 Sundance Film Festival.

The how and why of this absurd delay is explained in a section of the film’s website called “The Road To Release,” but Lbs. (a not-very-catchy title due to the abbreviation — it should been called Pounds or Fatass, even) may be the oldest indie film to ever open theatrically as a purportedly new release.

And yet, oddly, it doesn’t feel at all “dated.” Lbs. has its shaggy aspects, but there’s no denying that it has a well-honed, disarmingly honest, straight-from-the-shoulder quality. You watch and start to gradually sink into it, and you stop feeling like a smart-ass nitpicker and being bothered by time factors and whatnot.

Lbs. is about a dangerously overweight Brooklyn guy of only 27 years (Famiglietti) hitting rock bottom in terms of self-disgust and low self-esteem, and deciding to really and finally get rid of the tonnage. His method is to isolate himself from temptation by living in a crummy trailer in upstate New York and somehow discipline and bring himself along on a day-by-day, take-the-pain basis and drop 100 pounds or so.

There’s a married-girlfriend character of sorts (Miriam Shore) and a drug-addicted pally (Michael Aronov) and a villain — i.e., his food-pushing mom (Susan Varon). And there’s also a very strong performance from Lou Martini, Jr., as the groom of Famiglietti’s older sister.

A week or so ago a director-producer friend urged me to see Lbs.. He sent me a disc that arrived early last week, but I put off watching it for a few days. I finally popped it in last night, and this morning wrote the friend the following e-mail: “Not half bad. A well-acted, emotionally sincere, Italian blue-collar drama about addictions, honor, family values, and loving enablers.

“I would actually call it better than decent. It reminded me at times of Two Family House — remember that one? — and aspects of Paddy Chayefsky‘s Marty, even.”

I added that I didn’t believe that Shore’s character would be as forwardly matter-of-fact as she is in the film about wanting intimate relations with Famiglietti. I would have bought it if (a) she had been older (in her 40s, say) and indicated that she was deathly bored and in need of some random warmth, or (b) if she had confessed to having a fetish for big guys. We all know about male chubby chasers, but do women swing that way? I’ve never heard of this.

I think it may be somewhat meaningful for someone like myself, having written over and over (probably too many times) about deeply despising morbidly obese people, or more precisely the metaphor of obesity, responding to a film with this storyline. I think it speaks well to the film’s strengths.

Lbs. finally opens this Friday, and only in Manhattan yet. It should at least play Los Angeles before going off to video.

The figures are in and the top six weekend earners are Alice in Wonderland ($34,125,000 for a cume of $265,369,000), a distant-second Diary of a Wimpy Kid ($22,270,000), The Bounty Hunter ($20,785,000), Green Zone ($6,110,000), She’s Out Of My League ($6,015,000) and Repo Men ($5,900,000).

David Carr‘s review of Jules Feiffer’s “Backing Into Forward: A Memoir” gives me an excuse to re-post that Donald Sutherland sermon scene from Little Murders, the 1971 film that Feiffer adapted for the screen from his own play. My initial posting was two years ago.