N.Y. Times, February 4, 1939, Page 1….

N.Y. Times, February 4, 1939, Page 1….

ABC is deep-sixing Jimmy Kimmel Live! “indefinitely”, which sounds like “adios”, fare-thee-well and that’s all she wrote. The yanking was ostensibly about Kimmel saying something erroneous or insensitive about Charlie Kirk‘s alleged murderer, Tyler Robinson. Trump-appointed Federal Communications Commission Chair Brendan Carr wants Kimmel gone, having suggested that ABC’s broadcast license “is at risk from Kimmel’s statements about Robinson.” Nexstar Media Group, which is seeking FCC approval for a $6.2 billion merger with Tegna, was ebviously eager to dump Kimmel. The Trumpies, in short, are doing everything they can to eliminate late-night Trump antagonists.

For the last several months I’ve been skeptical about the notion of Paul Thomas Anderson‘s One Battle After Another (Warner Bros., 9.26), which I caught yesterday morning inside the AMC 34th Street, being any kind of artistic comeback flick, much less an Oscar contender. In my mind PTA has been vaguely downswirling or certainly treading water since There Will Be Blood (’07), his last really good film.
Well, it’s now Wednesday afternoon and I am no longer skeptical about the potential award-season fortunes of this film. It’s a serious winner — thrilling, complex, darkly humorous, poignantly emotional from a father-daughter perspective, dramatically scored, beautifully shot…it really connects. Battle might run into some trouble commercially as it’s strictly a blue-cities flick from a political-ideological standpoint, but in all other respects I am now a believer.
Battle is certainly a Best Picture contender, and it could even potentially win (although I doubt this given that it’s too emphatically woked-up and white-male-hating or white-male-pitying for general comfort). But it’s going to be nominated in almost every category. Anderson has bounced back big-time, and is certainly no longer slumping…he’s riding the award-season whirlwind. Who remembers the paranoid imaginings of Alan Pakula‘s The Parallax View (’74), and particularly the vibe of the Parallax Corporation? I’m not saying that Battle is even vaguely analogous to Parallax, but they do line up in one respect.
Pakula’s Parallax Corporation was run by shadowy, cold-blooded, conservatively-attired serpents who were in the business of murdering high-profile liberal politicians. I’m just saying that in PTA’s newbie, which actually has a happy ending, the Parallax Corporation is, at the very least, symbolically back in action, only this time the group is called the Christmas Adventurers, an elite cabal of white nationalists who aren’t plotting political killings but are certainly “think white”-ish and pulling racist strings when strategy requires it. I went into yesterday morning’s 9:30 am screening with an attitude of guarded optimism.
I was mainly hoping that it would be as good as what the earlybird whores have been crowing about for the last few days. I knew it wouldn’t be as good as what IndieWire‘s David Ehrlich has been saying (“…might be the best movie released by a major American studio since I started working as a critic in 2010”) because Ehrlich is, in my humble view, a foam-at-the-mouth woke fanatic, but I really wanted at least a ground-rule-double or a triple. I didn’t trust the idea of a home run as PTA has been off his game since Blood and probably, I’ve been calculating, sinking into soft mud, but I really wanted to hear the loud crack of the bat and the subsequent roar of the crowd. Battle, to put it mildly, has exceeded my expectations.
Form-wise it’s a total homer — a knockout masterwork from a gifted director who knows exactly what he’s doing and how to deliver the right stuff — while the content is so absurdly woked-up in a POC-favoring, over-the-waterfall-in-a-barrel way that it’s sure to be hated or certainly hooted at outside the big cities, especially in the wake of the Charlie Kirk shooting. Average Joes and Janes will say “yeah, a really good movie but what’s with the leftist guerilla-revolution jazz?
In the wake of the Charley Kirk tragedy they’re releasing a hooray-for-the-left, defy-the-malevolent-whiteys film? A movie that says all white people and especially guys in starched military fatigues with close-cropped hair are bad…we get that, this is what Hollywood always does…whitey bad, POCs good…whitey baddie-waddie, POCs are spirit angels and God’s chosen..but the Kirk tragedy has changed the political landscape.”
I for one didn’t mind the woke current because OBAA is so damnably well directed. I think it’s PTA’s best film ever, and if you ask me and Warner Bros. marketing’s decision not to premiere it in Venice or Telluride was nonsensical. The present-tense section (the first 40 minutes are set in ’09 or thereabouts while the remaining two hours are set in the present) happens in a Trumpian police-state world that feels fairly current (ICE-like military invasions, rounded-up immigrants held inside chain-link-fence compounds, white shitheads in military fatigues and business suits bringing racist rain down upon the heads of change-seeking POC lefties) and is basically….well, not about an ongoing battle between the POC wokies and the big bad whiteys, although it’s the only seriously action-driven, car-chasey PTA film ever.
Battle is primarily about a father’s attempt to rescue his daughter from rightwing kidnappers (i.e., the present-tense material), but it’s based on an oddly sexual romantic triangle between Leonardo DiCaprio‘s Bob Ferguson (grizzled ex-revolutionary), Sean Penn’s Col. Steven J. Lockjaw (broomstick up his ass, hot for black chicks) and Teyana Taylor‘s Perfidia Beverly Hills, which is dramatized during the first 40. A triangle, incidentally, that doesn’t even spark conflict or recriminations Battle is so well done, so gripping, so well acted, shot and cut, so dynamically captured….the 160 minutes fly by like they’re 95 or 100. But it’s so fucking woke and so virulently against heavily-fortified white authority figures, it’s not going to fly in red states…not in the wake of the Kirk murder.
Owen Gleiberman: “The film spooks us with the question: Is this where America is now heading? Anderson completed the movie before Donald Trump took office in January 2025, but it’s presented as a knowing projection of what autocracy under the current administration could lead to. The film isn’t just some abstract metaphoric cinematic speculation; it’s designed to look and feel just ahead of the curve of where we’re at now. And since Once Battle After Another is trying to be ruthlessly authentic about how an authoritarian state works, the revolutionaries, it turns out, don’t have much of a chance. “The film suggests that the current white-nationalist movement is, in heart, an attempt to separate white and Black people as a primal way of pretending that black-white sexual relationships of the past never happened. And that this denial is nothing less than the key fantasy driving the new alt-right America.
Bob leaves revolution in the dust to rescue his mixed-race daughter, but the movie says that what he’s doing is the real revolution: finding a family that you fight to hold together; keeping Black and white together, as they long have been; keeping hope alive, in the face of a regime that employs the stifling of hope as a ruling tactic. The movie says that out of this revolt of the everyday a greater revolution will rise.” All hail the performances by DiCaprio, Taylor, Penn plus Chase Infiniti (excellent actress!), Regina Hall, Shayna McHayle, Alana Haim, Starlette DuPois, D.W. Moffett, Paul Grimstead, James Raterman, Tony Goldwyn, Jim Downey.
My WordPress theme design (Armory) has stopped updating and hasn’t for years. My fault entirely. The Revolution slider has also stopped functioning. It’s now obsolete, and almost the whole thematic structure and operation of Hollywood Elsewhere has collapsed into a heap of soggy dysfunctional pretzels. We’ve lost the style sheet.
My designer and I are now searching for a new theme (possibly Flexblog) and a new provider of a slider mechanism. The process will take a few hours but it’ll be a good thing to finally update the PHP and streamline the whole shebang according to 2025 standards.
Meanwhile I’m expanding upon my initial comment-thread post about PTA’s One Battle After Another (WB, 9.26). which I saw and quite liked (the absurd woke mindset aside) yesterday morning. The embargo lifts at noon eastern, 9 am Pacific.
I saw four films yesterday — One Battle After Another, plus (2) Darren Aronofsky‘s Caught Stealing (which I hated with a passion — I couldn’t stop muttering “go fuck yourself, go fuck yourself, go fuck yourself” to Austin Butler‘s lead character…I wanted him to take a bullet to the head so I wouldn’t have to hang with his sorry, beer-slurping ass), (3) Michael Angelo Covino and Kyle Marvin‘s Splitsville, a marital infidelity freestyle-farce sitcom which I didn’t exactly “like” but found unusual and occasionally funny and semi-diverting and therefore tolerable (although Covino and Marvin, who play the two male leads, aren’t nearly attractive enough to enlist audience empathy and identification — if I was gay or a woman I definitely wouldn’t want to fuck these guys…no way), and (4) Dag Johan Haugerud‘s Dreams (Sex Love), a quietly first-rate Norwegian drama that played in competition in Berlin last February and is now screening at the Film Forum.
Posted on 6.4.25: There have been several…okay, a few good films about death, and the best of them (like that closing statement at the ass-end of Barry Lyndon) impart a sense of absolute cosmic indifference about what happens or doesn’t happen when the lights go out. But that is almost unheard of.
Most of the good ones impart a sense of tranquility or acceptance about what’s to come**, which is what most of us go to films about death to receive.
They usually do this by selling the idea of structure and continuity. They persuade that despite the universe being run on cold chance and mathematical indifference, each life has a particular task or fulfillment that needs to happen, and that by satisfying this requirement some connection to a grand scheme is revealed.
You can call this a delusional wish-fulfillment scenario (and I won’t argue about that), but certain films have sold this idea in a way that simultaneously gives you the chills but also settles you down and makes you feel okay.
The legendary, justifiably admired and more or less worshipped Robert Redford has ascended, left the earth, bid farewell. We all knew it was coming, and it’s shocking — certainly upsetting — all the same.
Robert Redford’s greatest accomplishment, hands down, was launching the Sundance Film Festival. He really and truly changed…hell, revolutionized the landscape of American independent film. He upgraded, deepened, emboldened and monetized it beyond all measure.
The best film he ever directed was Ordinary People; Quiz Show and The Milagro Beanfield War were a distant second and third. The worst film he ever directed was The Legend of Bagger Vance, a.k.a. “bag of gas.” But acting is what he’s retiring from, and so an assessment of his best films and performances is in order.
Technique-wise and especially in his hot period, Redford was (and still is) one of the most subtle but effective underperformers in Hollywood history. He never overplayed it. Line by line, scene by scene, his choices were dry and succinct and exactly right — he and Steve McQueen were drinking from the same well back then.
Redford’s safe-deposit-box scene in The Hot Rock (i.e., “Afghanistan bananistan”) is absolutely world class. And the way he says “I can’t, Katie…I can’t” during the The Way We Were finale is brilliant. That scene could have been so purple or icky, but he saves it.
Redford’s acting career can be broken down into three phases — warm-up and ascendancy (’60 to ’67), peak star power (’69 to ’80) and the long, slow 34-year decline in quality (’84 to present).
Mark Harris tweeted last night that “not many actors can claim six decades of work almost entirely on their own terms.” But Redford’s power to dictate those terms lasted only during that 12-year, golden-boy superstar era, or between the immediate aftermath of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid and Brubaker, his last “’70s film.”
Redford’s best peakers, in this order: Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid (’69), All The President’s Men (’76), Three Days of the Condor (’75), The Candidate (’72), Downhill Racer (’70), The Sting (’73), Jeremiah Johnson (’72), The Hot Rock (’72), The Way We Were (’73), Tell Them Willie Boy is Here (’70), The Electric Horseman (’79) and Brubaker (’80) — a total of 11.
Think of that — over a 12-year period Redford starred in 11 grand-slammers, homers, triples and a couple of ground-rule doubles. That’s pretty amazing.
Mezzo-mezzos & whiffs during peak period: Little Fauss and Big Halsy, The Great Gatsby, The Great Waldo Pepper, A Bridge Too Far (4).
…is profoundly unattractive if not odious, and so in my eyes this “Girl Patriot” TikTok post is about as ugly as it gets. But the second guy (bald, glasses, weepy)…I’m actually suspecting this might not be real, that it’s an invented theatrical performance. But if it is real, it’s affecting. We all make mistakes. And as Warren Beatty‘s Bugsy Siegel once said, “Everybody needs a fresh start once in a while.”
Radical leftists were fired from their jobs after posting videos celebrating Charlie's death.
You can't help but smile as you watch. pic.twitter.com/NUb2SKN8Kp
— Girl patriot (@Girlpatriot1974) September 15, 2025
HE is arising at 6 am to catch a 7:26 am out of Westport and arrive in Manhattan by 8:46 am, and thereby catch a 9:30 am press screening of PTA’s One Battle After Another at the AMC 34th Street.
Obviously a major cinematic, award-season event, but also — let’s be honest — a possible mano e mano opinion clash with David Ehrlich. Or not! Who knows? We’ll see very soon.
The embargo lifts on Wednesday (tomorrow) at noon eastern.

Okay, so Chloe Zhao‘s Hamnet, having slain in Telluride and now having won the TIFF People’s Choice Award, is the frontrunner to win the 2025 Best Picture Oscar early next year. No argument, no quibbles….it’s a pretty clear=cut scenario.
The other big contenders are Paul Thomas Anderson‘s One Battle After Another, which I’m hoping to see in Manhattan on Tuesday morning (pretty please?), Joachim Trier‘s Sentimental Value (which I loved after catching in in Cannes) and — to hear it from the Ryan Coogler-deserves-this-because he’s-Ryan Coogler identity mob — Sinners. If Hamnet has it in the bag, fine. If PTA comes close to winning, great — excellent for his career, no longer the red-ink guy.
Either way Sinners hasn’t a chance, and thank the Lord God for that fact.