The only flagrantly bad thing about Avatar is James Cameron‘s decision to play a Leona Lewis song called “I See You,” written by overall score composer James Horner, over the closing credits. Cameron apparently still doesn’t understand that Titanic‘s closing vibe was ruined by the end-credit playing of “My Heart Will Go On,” that repulsive Celine Dion song. Including both tunes were total whore moves, looking to appeal to younger women, get a song played on the Oscar show, etc.

You can sometimes detect little hints in the online summaries of Sundance Film Festival selections (which are usually written by festival programmers) about how good or not-so-good the films are. And they’re evident, I think, in the summary for Floria Sigismondi‘s The Runaways, the ’70s rock-band biopic with Kristen Stewart as Joan Jett and Dakota Fanning as Cherie Currie. And I’m a little bit worried.

The film is “an ode to an era and a groundbreaking band,” the summary says. (In other words, it’s all over the place?) “Acclaimed video artist Floria Sigismondi directs from her own script” — danger! danger Will Robinson! “Her luscious camerawork captures every sweaty detail, from the filthy trailer where the women practice to the mosh pits of Tokyo,” it says. (In other words, the camerawork is fast, random and grab-baggy without conveying a unifying mood or aesthetic.) “What really makes the film cook are the sizzling performances by Fanning and Stewart.” (That’s fine but in what ways does the film itself cook? What does it say, where’s it coming from, what’s the angle or undercurrent?)

I’ve rented HE’s Sundance pad — a large one bedroom that sleeps three or four with a bedroom queen, a foldout couch and bunk beds — but now a filmmaker who was going to stay has bailed so I’m looking for someone to step in. It’s right near the Marriott and runs from Saturday, 1.23 to Saturday, 1.30, and it’s only $400. Yup, seven days in Park City for less than $60 a day. Oh, and I need a place to flop from Wednesday, 1.20 to Saturday morning, 1.23, if anyone knows or hears anything.

If a jarring or traumatic event happens in your adolescent or teen years, it can stay with you into adulthood, and can sometimes even trigger a neurosis or shape some aspect of your personality. This has been a recurring motif in I-don’t-know-how-many dramas I’ve seen about coping with this or that lingering issue. But what about stories in which a traumatic event or some kind of metaphorical face-slap wakes a character up? Not right away but gradually, I mean.

Who hasn’t had an experience that delivers some kind of stern but helpful cautionary tale? I certainly have, but I’m hard-pressed to remember a film or a play, even, that has told such a story. It’s always “oh, I had a terrible thing happen to me when I was 11 or 16 or whatever and I still haven’t gotten over it.”

I did some of my growing up in Westfield, New Jersey, where I lived from age 5 to 16 and 1/2, and it was in that mild-mannered little whitebread town where I experienced one of my key wake-up moments. It was a fall afternoon and I was sitting at a backyard patio table with a friend and his father. My friend and I were 16, and his 40ish dad, a sardonic, sometimes blunt-spoken dentist, was in a blunter-than-usual mood when he began to judge our character and prospects. You either had something on the ball, he said, or you were a washout. And then he looked at his son and said with dispassion, as if he was reading the price on a cereal box, “You’re a washout.” And then he looked at me and said, “And you’re a washout.”

It didn’t feel like much at the moment, but this was the first time in my life that an adult had looked me in the eye and told me I had more or less fucked myself with my lousy grades and my anti-authoritarian fuck-all attitude. I know I’ve never forgotten this, and I’m now persuaded on some level that these tough words lit a fire. I suddenly realized, “Uh-oh, I might have a real problem.” I’d been hearing this all my life from my parents, of course, and from most of my teachers. About what an under-performer I was, blah blah, and how I needed to change my ways. But somehow the dentist got through while the others had just made me turn off all the more. Their admonitions felt like mosquitoes or the meowing of cats outside my window.

And yet an adult dispensing blunt, straight-from-the-shoulder, take-it-or-leave-it candor to a teenaged son (or a friend of his teenaged son) is pretty much forbidden these days. You’re supposed to just show support and encouragement to your children and give them plenty of hugs. That’s good advice, I think. It’s all I’ve ever done (or tried to do) with my two sons. If I had to co-raise and co-counsel them over again I wouldn’t play it any differently. But I’m just as certain that a clanging alarm bell went off when I heard the “w” word, and I think I may have decided that day to prove the dentist wrong (or at least began to think along these lines), so he may have done me a pretty big favor. He’s dead now so maybe he’s hearing me say this on some level.

The start of the 2010 Santa Barbara Film Festival in early February will mark the four-year anniversary of the first appearance of John Scheinfeld‘s Who is Harry Nilsson (and Why Is Everybody Talkin’ About Him?). It has the ironic distinction of being one of the best rock-music docs ever made and at the same time totally finished as far as distribution prospects are concerned.

If you haven’t signed out a distribution deal after four years of trying your film isn’t just dead — it’s fish guts lying in a tin bucket on a pier. A real shame. Talking last night to Jeff Bridges about this film is what set me off.

Warwick Thornton‘s Samson and Delilah, an Aboriginal love-on-the-run drama as well as Australia’s official submission for ’09’s Best Foreign Film Oscar, won five Australian Film Institute awards last night, including Best Film. Thornton also won for Best Direction, Best Screenplay and Best Cinematography, and costars Marissa Gibson and Rowan McNamara were co-recipients of the AFI’s Young Actor award. On top of which Samson and Delilah has a 100% Rotten Tomatoes rating.

Marissa Gibson, Rowan McNamara in Warwick Thornton’s Samson and Delilah

So why wasn’t I doing cartwheels in the Grand Palais after seeing about 45 minutes worth in Cannes last May? Because Samson and Delilah doesn’t exactly rev its engines with rousing action and story tension during the first act, and because…I forget but I probably had another film to catch or an interview to do or a story to file. There’s always something nipping at your heels during that festival. Maybe I was simply letting the impatient, foot-tapping aspect of my Cannes personality run the show. My judgment isn’t infallible, and fatigue sometimes has a disproportionate influence.

It was obvious from the get-go that Thornton was (a) a serious and talented filmmaker and (b) investing in character and mood before putting his story in forward gear — i.e., before the lovers decide to steal a car and hightail it. Last night’s win, in any event, has persuaded me to watch Samson and Delilah again, jetlag-free. A screener, I’m told, is on its way.

An assessment of Los Angeles industry culture by HE regular LexG seems fairly sage. “I tend to think of Oscar movies as having to appeal to ‘LA Taste,'” he wrote last night. “Los Angelenos, particularly the voting denizens of Brentwood, Bel Air, and Beverly Hills, have a certain cinematic palate that isn’t just different from mass America, but from even NYC film fanatics or cineastes anywhere else. LA Taste is very milquetoast, very Clooney, very upscale. The kind of people who shop at the Grove and eat Whole Foods and prefer an intellectual barrier, an ironic remove.

“It’s sort of like how Scorsese and Spike are NYC directors who don’t get the same love in LA. LA people are removed, caustic, ironic, a little uncomfortable with that grimy, in-your-face intensity or crazy overkill. Someone like Altman or the Coens are an LA film geek’s director — that layer of taste, of commentary, of artistic remove and good-for-you propriety. Clint, of course, goes over like gangbusters at Oscar time because he reminds the Jack Gifford-looking old-time producers of the Old Classicism — extremely well put together movies that don’t make them personally uncomfortable.”

Mulling this over, George? You’re an actor-director-producer with talent, taste and marquee appeal on an excellent run and with all the right cool-director associations (Alexander Payne, Jason Reitman, Soderbergh, Coens, Wes Anderson, Anton Corbijn), and yet distant and muffled chants from the flatlands are equating the Clooney brand with “ironic remove” and the high-end offerings at Whole Foods.

I know — better to be the ironic remove guy than clunky-earnest and better Whole Foods than Ralph’s or that 1930s quonset-hut grocery store on Cahuenga, but you know what I’m saying. The intellectual streetcorner class is persuaded that the stuff you’re putting on the table is a little too sanctified and approved by the comfortables. Maybe you need to hit refresh, forge new alliances, talk to some scruffy young directors from Mexico or Israel or Iran…something. Live a little more dangerously while you can (i.e., before older-guy complacency takes over).

“The Avatar battle scenes are spectacular and thrilling,” writes Envelope/Gold Derby’s Tom O’Neil, “but the movie’s greatest fight lies ahead at the Academy Awards.” O’Neil’s Oscar pundit polls, conducted today, suggest that Avatar is suddenly a likely Best Picture contender, but James Cameron‘s film “will probably trip up in the home stretch” due to the Academy’s old-fart contingent.

“Last year’s critically cheered blockbusterThe Dark Knight didn’t even get nominated for best picture,” he notes. “But now there are 10 slots in a weak year, so Avatar can’t be denied its due place on the derby track.

“But Oscar voters are stubborn, narrow-minded graybeards. Computer-generated fantasy films, however amazing, aren’t ‘important’ in their eyes. They like their best pictures real. Sure, Lord of the Rings: Return of the King won the top prize and indeed went undefeated in all 11 categories, tying the record for most wins held by Ben-Hur and James Cameron’s Titanic, but that was only because the franchise wore voters down over the years.”

I hated, hated, hated the Lord of the Rings trilogy. I sympathized with the resistance to it. I mostly found it agonizing to sit through

Fox Searchlight threw a slate-promoting holiday party early this evening at Soho’s recently opened Crosby Street Hotel. Attending talent included the Crazy Heart team — Jeff Bridges, Maggie Gyllenhaal, director-writer Scott Cooper — and Fantastic Mr. Fox director Wes Anderson. I got some face time with all four plus prolific screenwriter Ron Bass, with whom I discussed college experiences, sons and hallucinogens.

Crazy Heart star Jeff Bridges holding court in Crosby Street Hotel lounge — Friday,12.11, 6:10 pm.

I also discussed drug adventures with Bridges, who partially based his acclaimed performance as Bad Blake on his own bad-boy history (which happened in either the ’70s or ‘early ’80s or both). He also pigged out two months before shooting began, eating mostly greasy high-calorie foods, and drank a little more than usual and got into smoking, etc.

Bridges performance is “honestly scuzzy…his best since The Big Lebowski but tonally opposite and much harder hitting, of course,” I wrote on 11.13. “He really swan-dives into the toilet. No sweeteners, no movie-star charm moments, no winking…except when he’s on-stage. The fact that Bridges doesn’t seem to be ‘acting’ is what makes it great acting.”

I had to compete a little bit for Bridges’ attention with a very fetching CNN segment producer sitting to his right. She wore an alluring black and white dress with a red scarf and red-suede boots. I can be a fairly spry conversationalist and managed to steer Bridges away for brief discussions of the late Harry Nilsson, the Santa Barbara Film Festival and the old Chez Jay restaurant in Santa Monica, but the segment producer…

Cooper and I discussed cinematography, mostly. Having never gone to film school, he educated himself in the look of ’70s movies, which he wanted Crazy Heart to resemble. He sank into a slew of ’70s films (Terrence Malick‘s Badlands, etc.) and took it from there. I told him I’m a huge fan of the look and pacing of Crazy Heart, but that I’m doubly impressed by the fact that Cooper doesn’t seem to be advertising to the audience how visually clever or gifted he was — he knows enough to stay out of the way of the story (which is based on Thomas Cobb‘s book and partly, Cooper said, on his hard-living grandfather).

Anderson and I mostly talked about the pleasures of Paris (he lives in Montparnasse), his girlfriend’s newly purchased home in Kent, England, and the prospect of hosting several guests, my liking of his screenplay adaptation of Patrice Leconte‘s My Best Friend, called The Rosenthaler Suite. It’s just a script for hire, he said. But you’ve really made it your own and it’s really good, I said. Yeah, he said, but I’m not sure what my next film will be.

I took two snaps of Wes and his brother, Eric Chase Anderson, and for some reason the auto-focus function failed both times.

Crazy Heart director-writer Scott Cooper — ditto, 6:35 pm.

Today’s tracking shows that Avatar‘s first choice number has risen to 22 — a one-day bump from yesterday’s 20 figure — and that under-25 women who are definitely not interested has shot up from yesterday’s 18 figure to 23. Do you see what I mean about Eloi girls? Their resistance to this film is very strong right now, or at least it was yesterday. Maybe they’ll chill down once the word seeps through.

The New York Film Critics Circle “has decided against a threatened crackdown on members who report on behind-the-scenes details of voting on awards this Monday,” reports Envelope/Gold Derby’s Tom O’Neil. “Fears ran high that members may be booted if they tattle on vote scores and other details of balloting after leaders responded furiously last year to one member blogging live during the vote session and another blabbing goings-on via Twitter.”

In other words, NYFCC chairman Armond White has waved off complaints voiced last year by Entertainment Weekly‘s Lisa Schwarzbaum. She told O’Neil in late ’08 “that she was so furious about the ‘betrayal of our group’s confidentiality’ that ‘a similar violation of the group’s bylaws would result in a stern response,'” he writes.

“When asked if that meant that a member who reveals vote scores would be ousted from the circle, she avoided a direct answer, saying, ‘Reporting the vote scores will not be tolerated.’

Last year’s uproar was caused by N.Y. Post critic Lou Lumenick, who was live blogging last year during the NYFCC voting session. Lumenick confided last night that he intends to run right back to his office on Monday after voting ends and post all of the scores in detail at his blog, so that’s where everyone can get the inside scoop fastest on Monday — who came in second place, third place, etc.

For whatever reason, the Los Angeles Film Critics Association award winners will be “announced” in two separate statements on Sunday, 12.13. The secondary awards (supporting actors, screenplay, cinematography, etc.) will be announced at 12:30 Pacific, and then the primary awards (best picture, director, actor, actress, etc.) will be announced at 2:30 pm Pacific.

Wouldn’t it be simpler to just post the winners on the LAFCA site as they’re decided upon, category by category in real time, the way the New York Film Critics Circle webmasters have been doing for years? Who cares about press releases? When I hear the term I think of announcements printed on paper. Quaint.

The “announcements” will also be simultaneously available via Twitter @lafilmcritics (http://twitter.com/LAFilmCritics) or www.lafca.net.