It’s a very uncomfortable thing to admit that you share an opinion with the utterly loathsome Sen. Lindsay Graham, but his calling for a Russian Brutus to assassinate President Vladimir Putin is a good one.

It would be the quickest way to end the slaughter in Ukraine. Seriously.

I’m no longer suggesting that Putin should be iced by Ethan Hunt and the Mission: Impossible team or that Willem Dafoe‘s “Clark” (from Clear and Present Danger) should send a smart missile to destroy his dacha — that was an ill-considered scenario as it would be traced back to the U.S, and perhaps ignite a huge worldwide conflict.

But a Russian who’s willing to sacrifice himself (or herself) in order to blow Putin to bits — that really would be a service to humanity, as Graham stated Thursday night.

“The only people who can fix this are the Russian people,” Graham wrote. “Easy to say, hard to do. Unless you want to live in darkness for the rest of your life, be isolated from the rest of the world in abject poverty, and live in darkness you need to step up to the plate.”

Roughly a week and a half ago IndieWire‘s Samantha Bergeson reported that Chris Nolan‘s Opppenheimer, which began shooting last month in New Mexico, “will be shot on a combination of IMAX 65mm and 65mm large-format film photography including, for the first time ever, sections in IMAX black-and-white analog photography.” Nobody outside of film critics, film nerds and fanatical Nolan-heads will want to to see this thing — one glance at that black-and-white head shot of Cillian Murphy tells you it’s a box-office stiff — but oh, the tantalizing prospect of black-and-white IMAX footage!

I should have paid attention to this Bullet Train trailer a day or two ago, but I didn’t want to, okay? Because I’m not a fan of lightweight power-pop director David Leitch (John Wick, Atomic Blonde, Deadpool 2). One glimpse tells you this Brad Pitt action comedy is Tarantino Lite — synthetic and stupid and aimed at the morons.

World of Reel‘s Jordan Ruimy has compiled a list of (seemingly) likely titles for Cannes ’22, which will kick off two and a half months hence.

Out-of-competition titles: Elvis, Top Gun: Maverick, Bullet Train, Nope, Lightyear. Perhaps George Miller’s Three Thousand Years of Longing (rumored to be something of a slog) will play OOC instead of competition.

The possible competition titles that I’m most excited about are Alejandro G. Innaritu‘s Bardo, Cristian Mungiu‘s R.M.N., Ruben Ostlund‘s Triangle of Sadness, James Gray‘s Armageddon Time and Kantemir Balagov‘s Monica. Here’s the general rundown:

Here’s Variety‘s Cannes projection.

This promotional prelude is being shown before all presentations at the Santa Barbara Int’l Film Festival. My immediate response was “wow, this is exceptional…who did this?” It turns out that the director, writer and cinematographer is none other than SBIFF honcho Roger Durling. The painter on the beach is Hank Pitcher, who painted this year’s SBIFF poster. He’s also the narrator.

The last two lines in Durling’s short are “desire and discovery”, which immediately reminded me of a Howard Suber insight about the basic plot strategies of Some Like It Hot and The Graduate — Desire, Deception and Discovery, or “the three dees.”

What film are these non-film-scholars talking about? Not The Power of the Dog.

What kind of psychotic fiend army would risk another Chernobyl in order to weaken an opponent? We all understand that war is cruel — this is fang-tooth saliva stuff.

This is Tom Burdette, and we’ll leave the light on for ya.

About a week ago (2.25) I mentioned that the Santa Barbara Film Festival will present an on-stage interview with the five 2022 nominees for the 2022 Best Director Oscar — The Power of the Dog‘s Jane Campion, Drive My Car‘s Ryusuke Hamaguchi, Licorice Pizza‘s Paul Thomas Anderson, Belfast‘s Kenneth Branagh and West Side Story‘s Steven Spielberg.

It happens tonight at 8 pm. THR‘s Scott Feinberg will moderate. These SBIFF events are all about praise and softballs so it’s unlikely that Feinberg will ask anything the least bit challenging. However…

In my 2.25 piece I suggested that Feinberg ask Anderson the following: “As you know, for the last four or five years Hollywood progressives have has dictated that all historical films have to adopt the practice of presentism in terms of casting. That means that all casts have to reflect social values as they should be in terms of inclusion and representation rather than how they actually may have been during the time of the story. (Presentism anticipates the Academy’s representation and inclusion standards that will apply concurrent with the 2024 Oscars.)

Anderson question: “Late last year you were challenged on a racial insensitivity issue. Licorice Pizza has a couple of scenes in which a middle-aged white guy speaks to his Japanese wife (actually two wives in succession) with a bizarre Japanese accent. You responded that you think it’s more important to portray all the aspects of a given era accurately rather than default to presentism. Would you care to elaborate on this dispute and re-explain where you were coming from?”

I’ve decided to revise my suggestion. Feinberg should instead ask all five directors to answer this: “In your opinion, which is the higher calling in the making of a period film? Is it better to (a) follow the guidelines and dictates of presentism, which aims to reflect social values as they should be in terms of inclusion and representation rather than how they actually were during the time of a given story, or (b) present this or that historical era honestly, as it actually was and without any progressive sugar-coating?”

I’m still in West Hollywood as we speak (3 pm), but I’ve got five hours to play with. Drive up to Santa Barbara, pick up the press pass, unload my stuff at a nice SBIFF-comped hotel (Lavender by the Sea) and get up to the Arlington Theatre sometime between 7:30 and 8 pm.

Earlier today I was telling World of Reel‘s Jordan Ruimy that Colin Farrell‘s Penguin (aka Oswald “Oz” Cobblepot) kept reminding me physically and verbally of Michael Rapaport…if, that is, Rapaport was wearing Penguin makeup.

Jordan said that Farrell’s Penguin reminded him more of Richard Kind, and after he sent me the below two-shot, I realize that he’s right — they’re almost dead ringers.