I decided sometime during eighth grade that attractive women looked hotter when they wore glasses, especially the black-rimmed kind. Then I saw that scene in How To Marry A Millionaire when David Wayne convinces Marilyn Monroe that she looks sexier wth glasses than without, and I knew just what he meant. Flash forward a few decades to Thursday, 7.19.12, when I saw Tony Gilroy‘s The Bourne Legacy and decided that Rachel Wiesz looks extra-double super-fetching because of the black-rimmed glasses she wears now and then in her role as a scientist.

Marilyn Monroe, David Wayne in How To Marry A Millionaire.

I’ve been watching Weisz for 15-plus years and it’s been “okay, fine, whatever” as far as her looks are concerned. She’s beautiful, of course, but we’ve known that for years so I don’t melt into my seat or turn into jello every time she appears on-screen. It’s almost like she’s my sister or my ex-wife or something. But when she put on those glasses in Legacy it was suddenly “whoa…wait a minute.”

But after searching online this afternoon I wasn’t able to find a single still of Weisz wearing those glasses in any scene from The Bourne Legacy…not one. That means she or her publicist either (a) told the unit photographer they didn’t want any taken with the glasses or (b) killed all glases shots upon submission. In other words, Weisz is apparently just as convinced that she looks like hell with her Bourne glasses as Monroe’s character was convinced she looked like hell with her glasses in How To Marry A Millionaire.

There’s no talking to women about how they look really good in a certain way if they themselves haven’t come to this conclusion first, so this is the end of it. The only men that women will even think about trusting as far as what to wear or what attitude to project or how to wear their hair or whatever are gay guys, or more particularly gay hair stylists or fashion designers. The opinion of straight guys means absolutely zip.

Rachel Weisz, director-writer Tony Gilroy during filming The Bourne Legacy.

Because of the dominance and dictatorship of the National Rifle Association, “we have laws no one wants — not cops, not the military, not even most gun owners themselves — except the NRA,” writes The Daily Beast‘s Michael Tomasky.

“Democrats went gun-shy in the 2000s. By 2008, Barack Obama had little to say about gun control, even trying to disavow his signature on a 1996 document signed by some Illinois legislators backing a ban on all handguns. In 2009, there were 65 pro-gun Democrats on Capitol Hill. The lobby owns the GOP, well, lock, stock, and barrel.

“Earlier this year, the Indiana state house passed — with NRA backing — a bill spelling out when citizens could kill police officers. Some prominent military leaders wanted military personnel to be able to discuss gun safety with troops as a way of trying to stem military suicides, many of which are committed with personally owned guns. The NRA was having none of it.

“And so it’s no surprise that Obama and Mitt Romney (who once supported waiting periods and the assault weapons ban) produced mealy-mouthed statements on Friday that didn’t even include the word ‘gun’. Many Democrats from urban districts will continue to oppose the NRA. But the party will continue to quake, shooting after shooting after shooting, bodies upon bodies upon bodies.

“So this will happen again. And again, and again. In fact, as I said above, we are likely headed for a day in this country like the following. At a movie theater, in a mall, at a commuter rail platform, in a restaurant — some glory-seeker opens fire. Most people duck and scatter, but a decent percentage of them produce their pieces. The gunman goes down like Warren Beatty in Bonnie and Clyde, but, since ‘most people’ aren’t marksmen, maybe a few other people do too, and maybe, oh, a three year old.

“But hey. There’s always a spoilage factor. Rights are sacred. From their cold, dead hands…”

Rolling Stone‘s Matt Taibbi said in a 7.19 “Democracy Now!” interview that Average Joes were screwed by the Libor scandal because lower interest rates almost certainly led to major cuts in state and local government spending.

“If you live in a town that had a budget crisis, that had to lay off firemen or teachers or policemen, or couldn’t provide services or textbooks in their schools, you know, that might be due to this,” Taibbi said. “Basically, every city and town in America, to say nothing of the rest of the world, has investments that are pegged to Libor.”

Sixteen gangsta banks, including Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, and Citigroup, are facing possible prosecution for allegedly rigging the Libor, a defining kingshit interest rate that banks agree to and use to lend money to each other. Hundreds of trillions of dollars in loans and derivatives were set by Libor. It is believed that its manipulation possibly cost some cities and states many, many millions.

Every couple of years Hollywood Elsewhere enforces a Stalinist purge of the most belligerent and infuriating right-wingers, who hang around this place like rats. The first big one was in ’08, and then another one happened in September ’09. I’m thinking about another purge today because of some truly appalling rightwing, NRA-supporting sentiments heard in the wake of last night’s massacre in Aurora. I’m asking for readers to please identify those righties whom they feel have given the greatest offense. The whackings will happen this weekend.

Written by Andy Borowitz and posted this afternoon on The New Yorker‘s website.

Yesterday I wrote that the new digital 4K version of Lawrence of Arabia that I saw in Cannes last May “looked as beautiful as ever, but it didn’t look as sharp and precise as I wanted it to look. The lenses and cameras used by dp Freddie Young in 1961 and ’62 couldn’t deliver the clarity and detail that you can see in films shot with the digital Red camera.”

Which is true, but I saw the digitally restored version again at the Academy last night, and for whatever reason it looked slightly but significantly better than it did in Cannes. It was like like perfect 70mm candy. What I saw made me feel high, in a sense. It’s never looked more luscious.

A special huzzah for Sony”s Grover Crisp, who’s been working on the digital Lawrence upgrade for two years. I was shocked to realize that Crisp’s name doesn’t appear in the restoration credits at the end along with Robert Harris‘s and all the others. “Grover, your name isn’t in the credits…why?,” I asked him in the upstairs lobby. Crisp said he’s not big on taking credit and that seeing how well the film has turned out is satisfying enough. What a guy.

Before the screening I was told that the famous “lost” balcony scene between Jack Hawkins and Peter O’Toole — the one that begins right after Hawkins notices the blood streaks leaking through Lawrence’s military jacket and then leads him outdoors and says “tell me what happened” — will probably be included as an extra on the Bluray.

I suspected after 9/11 that air fares would drop sharply with no one wanting to travel, and I was right. A week or two later I bought a very reasonably-priced round-trip fare to Paris. By the same token I’ve been thinking that perhaps a certain percentage of moviegoers might not want to see The Dark Knight Rises this weekend after last night’s tragedy, and that I could slip in at the last moment and snag an IMAX seat. No such luck. Deadline‘s Nikki Finke says there’s been no slowdown at all today and that Chris Nolan‘s film might take in as much as $180 to $200 million by Sunday night.

In a piece that posted last night The Guardian‘s Ben Child quoted original “Bane” creator Chuck Dixon, who created Batman’s super-buffed antagonist for the 1993 DC Comics series Knightfall, saying that (a) both he and artistic collaborator Graham Nolan are “lifelong conservatives,” (b) Bane is “more akin to an Occupy Wall Street type if you’re looking to cast him politically,” and (c) “if there ever was a Bruce Wayne running for the White House it would have to be [Mitt] Romney.”

So I hope everyone (Rush Limbaugh included) understands the deal now. And you know what? The Dark Knight Rises is so good I don’t care. I said in my review that the Republican scent is there but the film is so mesmerizing, etc. (Tip of the hat to Movieline‘s Jen Yamato.)

Whoa…just realized something. If the “Republican fantasy” meme circulates among Academy members The Dark Knight Rises may not be nominated for Best Picture. That plus last night’s awful news leaves a bad taste in a vaguely associative way.

“I believe anthropologists and historians will look back on us and simply conclude that we were a violent nation, at home and abroad, but in due time human decency won out and the violence ceased, but not before many, many more had died and the world had had its fill of us.” — Bowling for Columbine director Michael Moore responding to last night’s Aurora shooting in a piece by TheWrap‘s Steve Pond.

Several reports and second-hand/heresay observations are saying that last night’s Aurora shooter, James Holmes, had his hair dyed red and that he was telling the cops that he was the Joker. So if this is true, Holmes didn’t murder with sincerity? He did it ironically, as a perverse performance-art piece? An hour ago I heard a young woman who was in the theatre when the shooting started tell an MSNBC interviewer everything she saw, heard and felt, and she didn’t mention the guy’s appearance at all.