In a 1.5 piece titled “11 Movies To Watch Out For In 2015: The Non-Blockbuster Must-See Features Of The Year,” Esquire‘s Nick Schager has included Cameron Crowe‘s Son of Deep Tiki (Columbia, 5.29). Three possible factors: (1) Schager didn’t put two and two together when the film (otherwise known as “Untitled Cameron Crowe Project“) was bumped out of a 12.25.14 opening and into May 2015, (2) he didn’t get the December memo about Sony chief Amy Pascal’s displeasure with the film, or (3) he’s just a Crowe fan from way back and has decided against letting Elizabethtown and We Bought A Zoo get in the way of that. And that’s fine.

Seriously, I’m not trying to be an asshole here. I’ll always admire Crowe’s work throughout the ’90s and up until Almost Famous with…okay, a certain respect for Vanilla Sky. I’m sorry that things haven’t worked out that well over the last decade, but tomorrow is another day. So why doesn’t Crowe just shut down the heckling section by giving his upcoming film a title, for God’s sake? How hard can that be? If he were to actually call it Son of Deep Tiki (because the original version that had its plug pulled during pre-production was called Deep Tiki), it wouldn’t be all that bad. My point is that nothing says “watch out!” like a movie that hasn’t had a title for eons and still doesn’t have one less than five months before opening.

At last night’s Chateau Marmont Boyhood party I said hi to an L.A.-based female journalist who shall not be named or described. I mentioned that I’d just read something about one of the Charlie Hebdo killers having surrendered with the other two still at large. She looked at me with a friendly but uncertain expression. It was like she was saying “and…?” I could have been talking about fishing in a mountain stream near Yosemite. Her eyes shifted slightly, looking for a way to politely disengage. I should have known better than to talk about something that was of absolutely no interest to her, particularly at a party for Boyhood. I didn’t want to make it worse by saying something like “oh, sorry…I thought you might have a passing interest in discussing the murder of several French journalists” so I just smiled and said as little as possible. I’m sure that right after this she made her way over to where Patricia Arquette was sitting.

Illustration from the pen of Dutch political cartoonist Ruben L. Oppenheimer

Here are some of the winners from last night’s People’s Choice Awards. I too drank from the cup of cluelessness when I was 15, but I had at least some respect for certain actors and movies that had a little subversion going on…a little something that offered more than just the usual crap. Favorite Movie: Malificient; Favorite Movie Actor: Robert Downey Jr.; Favorite Movie Actress: Jennifer Lawrence; Favorite Movie Duo: Shailene Woodley & Theo James in Divergent; Favorite Action Movie: Divergent. Favorite Action Movie Actor: Chris Evans (okay, I’ll buy that); Favorite Action Movie Actress: Jennifer Lawrence; Favorite Comedic Movie: 22 Jump Street; Favorite Comedic Movie Actor: Adam Sandler (!!!); Favorite Comedic Movie Actress: Melissa McCarthy; Favorite Dramatic Movie: The Fault in Our Stars; Favorite Dramatic Movie Actor: Robert Downey Jr.; Favorite Family Movie: Maleficent.

“Many of the Western voices criticizing the editors of Hebdo have had things exactly backward: Whether it’s the Obama White House or Time Magazine in the past or the Financial Times and (God help us) the Catholic League today, they’ve criticized the paper for provoking violence by being needlessly offensive and “inflammatory” (Jay Carney’s phrase), when the reality is that it’s precisely the violence that justifies the inflammatory content. In a different context, a context where the cartoons and other provocations only inspired angry press releases and furious blog comments, I might sympathize with the Financial Times’Tony Barber when he writes that publications like Hebdo “purport to strike a blow for freedom when they provoke Muslims, but are actually just being stupid.” (If all you have to fear is a religious group’s fax machine, what you’re doing might not be as truth-to-power-ish as you think.) But if publishing something might get you slaughtered and you publish it anyway, by definition you are striking a blow for freedom, and that’s precisely the context when you need your fellow citizens to set aside their squeamishness and rise to your defense.” — from Ross Douhat‘s 1.7 N.Y. Times column titled “The Blasphemy We Need.” Incidentally: Check out these twitter posts.

Offices of Charlie Hebdo following yesterday’s massacre.

When Variety posted Guy Lodge‘s favorable review of Paul King and David Heyman‘s Paddington on 11.19, my reaction was, no offense, one of mistrust. First, you have to consider the native loyalty factor in any British critic’s review of a British-made film, and second, Lodge can be a tiny bit dweeby. (My suspicions were first aroused during the 2010 Cannes Film Festival when he creamed over Abbas Kiarostami‘s Certified Copy/Copie Conforme.) But during last night’s Boyhood party at the Chateau Marmont I was told by three journalists I know and trust that Paddington really works on its own terms and is quite good and so on. They saw it earlier this week at Harmony Gold/Aidikoff screenings I had blown off. I had presumed it must be a bit of a weak sister if Weinstein/Dimension had decided to give it a mid-January release. If it was a half-decent qualifier for a Best Animated Feature Oscar (and especially with Weinstein having shown Paddington excerpt footage in Cannes last May), why not give it a limited 2104 release in December? But those three guys insist it’s a real performer. On the other hand the clips I’ve seen make it seem awfully broad and geared to kids…I don’t know. Right now Paddington has a 97% Rotten Tomatoes rating. It opens here on 1.16. I’ll be catching a screening early next week.

Universal Pictures marketing has never pointed to the conservative Christian subtext in Unbroken, or more precisely a notion that there’s a kind of purity and nobility that comes from prolonged suffering under the yoke of ungodly people because, you know, Jesus suffered this way under Pontius Pilate. In my original 12.1 review I noted that Unbroken delivers “a good kind of suffering…something tells me the Orange County crowd will find a place [for it] in their hearts.” The mountain of moolah that Unbroken has made since opening on 12.25 seems to indicate that some kind of rapport with hinterland types has taken place, even if Angelina Jolie‘s film doesn’t include the “Billy Graham born-again” and the “subsequent forgiveness of The Bird” chapters in Louis Zamperini‘s true-life tale.

But today the Christian subtext was finally touted when Pope Francis attended a screening of Unbroken at Rome’s Casina Pio IV, headquarters of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences and Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, with Jolie and Luke Zamperini, son of the late Louis, in attendance. Pope Francis, Queen Elizabeth…Unbroken is really cooking with implied endorsements from highest-level, semi-holy types. What other religious leaders could be engaged? The Dalai Lama is probably a no-go as Buddhists aren’t really into the whole “the more you’re beaten and tortured, the closer you are to God” equation.

When actors attract hot award-season buzz the first thing their agents do is land them paycheck roles in a big-studio production or two. Get into that stuff while the going’s good, right? And so Birdman‘s Michael Keaton, probably the leading Best Actor contender right now, is joining the cast of Legendary Pictures’ Kong: Skull Island so he can run around and howl and possibly get eaten. Already cast are Thor‘s Tom Hiddleston and Whiplash‘s J.K. Simmons, whose performance as a manic music instructor will likely win him a Best Supporting Actor Oscar. Oscars, paychecks and dinosaurs, oh my! Jordan Vogt-Roberts (The Kings of Summer) will direct Kong: Skull Island from a script written by John Gatins and Max Borenstein. Universal Pictures will release the film in 3D and IMAX 3D on 3.10.17.

Deadline‘s Nellie Andreeva ran a piece today about Matt Bomer (The Normal Heart, Magic Mike) playing Montgomery Clift in an HBO Films biopic down the road. Bomer is nearly a dead ringer for the late actor, but his plan to star in Monty Clift was announced over two months ago during the Savannah Film Festival, which Bomer attended. (I was there also and tried to speak to Bomer about the Clift project, but festival publicists stiffed me.) The HBO film will be “centered around the acclaimed actor’s tumultuous personal life,” Deadline says. That alludes to Clift having been psychologically screwed up (to some extent due to his being deeply closeted) with a major drinking problem going back to the early ’50s, and the fact that he all but destroyed his looks and his matinee-idol career when he piled a car into a telephone pole in ’56, after which he added prescription drugs and pain pills to the boozing.

(l.) Matt Bomer; (r.) the late Montgomery Clift.

  In my mind Clift, the first method-y actor to punch through the studio system and become a major star, peaked from Red River through From Here To Eternity — a seven-year run. But after the accident he went from being one of the best-looking actors who’d ever lived to a twitchy geek with big ears and a crackly, spazzy voice. It took Clift ten years to kill himself. Upon his death in July 1966 the final decade of his life was called “the slowest suicide in show-business history” or words to that effect.

This afternoon a Boyhood Bluray was left on my doormat, and tonight there’s a cool-sounding Boyhood party at a certain old-world location. Director Richard Linklater and costars Ethan Hawke, Patricia Arquette and Ellar Coltraine will attend. The official inviters are Diane Keaton, John Hamm, Frank Marshall, Sean Daniel, Jack Black and Julie Delpy. I always laugh when the person who initially sent the invite writes back to say that (a) rsvps are through the roof and that (b) you therefore might want to come a little bit later (it’s a four-hour event) and (c) if you’re thinking of not attending to please let us know. The 2-disc Paramount Home Video release popped yesterday.

A few days ago Awards Daily contributor Ryan Adams created a cool Photoshopped Birdman image of myself and Michael Keaton that I really liked, and so I wrote him and said so and he responded with a thanks. The guy had been a belligerent punk and a salivating attack dog ever since hooking up with Sasha but all of a sudden he was being nice and I was saying to myself, “Okay…maybe he’s not 100% bad…maybe there’s a tolerable human side to this guy after all.” But last night he, Craig Kennedy and Sasha Stone trashed me a couple of times on their Awards Daily Oscar podcast when they discussed the LBJ/Selma thing. Boiled down they more or less said that if you side with the LBJ advocates you’re either (a) a “dinosaur” like Peter Bart or (b) a closet racist who can’t stand the idea of having to share control of the culture and the film industry with non-whites, and that (c) it’s cool for African American filmmakers to do a little distortion of their own in order to balance the scales.

And then towards the end Adams said a particularly rash thing:

“…[like people who] got behind their favorite and they’ve already bought in and laid their money down on the movie they like the best. Like Jeff Wells. With Birdman. He’s been the Birdman guy all year along. Any movie now that comes along and potentially, even remotely poses a threat to Birdman, he’s not gonna like. He’s not gonna like any movie that’s not Birdman. He’s gonna damn it with faint praise and he’s gonna slur it and slam it any way he can think of. And it’s a sleazy way to cover movies, I think.”

It’s “sleazy” to have a favorite and to be enthused about that? If you have a favorite film you’re only allowed to…what, say this two or three times, mildly and somewhat mushily, and then you have to shut up until Oscar season ends? I’ve never put other films down in order to build Birdman up…never. Over the course of 2014 I went apeshit for at least 27 films, and every review is easily findable on HE. I happen to like Birdman more than Boyhood, okay, but that doesn’t mean I don’t admire and respect Boyhood, and that I wouldn’t be totally fine if it wins the Best Picture Oscar.

With its awful, dumbed-down re-design that makes it difficult to find their release date charts, Comingsoon.net has screwed the pooch. I’m told that release date info is buried somewhere in the bowels of that site, but I will never go there again. And for good reason because Ted Smith‘s Projectionlist.com is a much, much better and more exacting resource. It lists all theatrical releases in a nice, clean format with sections for direct-to-home, trailer dates, TV series and retail. It’s beautiful. There’s also a key at the bottom for wide/small releases. A colleague calls Projectionlist.com “a dream come true, especially after ComingSoon.net’s botched redesign…no disrespect to Ed Douglas but Coming Soon on their best day was never this clean.”